Polar bears are a potentially endangered species living in the circumpolar north. They are animals which know no boundaries. They pad across the ice from Russia to Alaska, from Canada to Greenland and onto Norway's Svalbard archipelago. Biologists estimate that there are 20,000 to 25,000 bears with about sixty percent of those living in Canada. The main threat to polar bears today is the loss of their icy habitat due to climate change. Polar bears depend on the sea ice for hunting, breeding, and in some cases to den. The summer ice loss in the Arctic is now equal to an area the size of Alaska, Texas, and the state of Washington combined. At the most recent meeting of the IUCN Polar Bear Specialist Group(Copenhagen, 2009), scientists reported that of the 19 subpopulations of polar bears, eight are declining, three are stable, one is increasing, and seven have insufficient data on which to base a decision—this is a change from five that were declining in 2005, five that were stable, and two that were increasing. During the meeting, delegates renewed their conclusion from previous meetings that the greatest conservation challenge to the polar bear is ecological change in the Arctic related to climate warming. On May 14, 2008, the U.S. Department of the Interior reclassified the polar bear as a Threatened Species under the Endangered Species Act, citing concerns about sea ice loss. Russia lists the polar bear as a species of concern. In areas where long-term studies are available, populations are showing signs of stress due to shrinking sea ice. Canada's Western Hudson Bay population has dropped 22% since the early 1980s. The declines have been directly linked to an earlier ice break-up on Hudson Bay. A long-term study of the Southern Beaufort Sea population, which spans the northern coast of Alaska and western Canada, has revealed a decline in cub survival rates and in the weight and skull size of adult males. Such declines were observed in Western Hudson Bay bears prior to the population drop there. Another population listed as declining is Baffin Bay. According to the most recent report from the Polar Bear Specialist Group, this population, shared by Greenland and Canada, may simultaneously be suffering from significant sea ice loss and substantial over-harvesting, putting the population at great risk of a serious decline. Similarly, the Chukchi Sea population, which is shared by Russia and the United States, is likely declining due to illegal harvest in Russia and one of the highest rates of sea ice loss in the Arctic. Some Native communities in Canada have been reporting increasing numbers of polar bears on land. Traditional hunters believe this indicates an increased population, although the increased presence on land may, in fact, be related to shrinking sea ice and changes in the bears' distribution patterns. Data is needed to understand the change. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service states, "In the declining polar bear population of Canada's Western Hudson Bay, extensive scientific studies have indicated that the increased observation of bears on land is a result of changing distribution patterns and a result of changes in the accessibility of sea ice habitat." In the 1960s and 1970s, hunting was the major threat to the bears. At the time, polar bears were under such severe survival pressure from hunters that a landmark international accord was reached, despite the tensions and suspicions of the Cold War. The International Agreement on the Conservation of Polar Bears was signed in Oslo, November 15, 1973 by the five nations with polar bear populations: Canada, Denmark (Greenland, Norway, the U.S., and the former U.S.S.R. The polar bear nations agreed to prohibit random, unregulated sport hunting of polar bears and to outlaw hunting the bears from aircraft and icebreakers as had been common practice. The agreement also obliged each nation to protect polar bear denning areas and migration patterns and to conduct research relating to the conservation and management of polar bears. Finally, the nations agreed to share their polar bear research findings with each other. Member scientists of the Polar Bear Specialist Group now meet every three to four years under the auspices of the IUCN World Conservation Union to coordinate their research on polar bears throughout the Arctic. The Oslo agreement was one of the first and most successful international conservation measures enacted in the 20th century. Its legacy continues today, with member scientists from each nation continuing to work together in face new threats to the bears including climate change, pollution, industrial activities, and poaching. codeTHE PROBLEM:
The polar bear population in the circumpolar north are becoming potentially endangered species. Biologist estimate that there are 20,000 to 25,000 bears with about 60% living in Canada. The biggest threat to the species is the depletion of their icy habitat due to the climate change. They depend on the ice for food, and reproducing. On May 14, 2008, the U.S. Department of the Interior reclassified the polar bears as threatened species. Most of the declines have been directly linked to the problem with the ice melting and habitat depletion. Many have also hunted the polar bears using aircrafts and icebreakers, in which was popular and common. They have also started to band the sport of hunting of the polar bears in several places that have polar bears. THE POTENTIAL CONSEQUENCES: -The species of polar bears will continue to decrease and eventually be eliminated. The environment issues will increase more and more. Global warming is increasing and contributed to polar ice caps melting and the climate becoming warmer. This problem might increase in time all over the world and create problems for future generations to come. THE SOLUTIONS: Stop the depletion of the o-zone layer and global warming. The should become more stricter with environmental laws. They should stop the air pollution and try to make the air cleaner. They should start taking big steps to clean up the pollution that is helping to deplete the o-zone layer. They should make sure the laws on hunting are stricter and should closely watch hunters and offenders. THE ECONOMY: the profits that are made from the hunting and selling of the polar bears will be non existence. That might help to feed families. They are using money to help monitor the hunting and to help clean up the environment.
* Biodiversity- the lovely polar bears.
Polar bears are a potentially endangered species living in the circumpolar north. They are animals which know no boundaries. They pad across the ice from Russia to Alaska, from Canada to Greenland and onto Norway's Svalbard archipelago. Biologists estimate that there are 20,000 to 25,000 bears with about sixty percent of those living in Canada. The main threat to polar bears today is the loss of their icy habitat due to climate change. Polar bears depend on the sea ice for hunting, breeding, and in some cases to den. The summer ice loss in the Arctic is now equal to an area the size of Alaska, Texas, and the state of Washington combined. At the most recent meeting of the IUCN Polar Bear Specialist Group(Copenhagen, 2009), scientists reported that of the 19 subpopulations of polar bears, eight are declining, three are stable, one is increasing, and seven have insufficient data on which to base a decision—this is a change from five that were declining in 2005, five that were stable, and two that were increasing. During the meeting, delegates renewed their conclusion from previous meetings that the greatest conservation challenge to the polar bear is ecological change in the Arctic related to climate warming. On May 14, 2008, the U.S. Department of the Interior reclassified the polar bear as a Threatened Species under the Endangered Species Act, citing concerns about sea ice loss. Russia lists the polar bear as a species of concern. In areas where long-term studies are available, populations are showing signs of stress due to shrinking sea ice. Canada's Western Hudson Bay population has dropped 22% since the early 1980s. The declines have been directly linked to an earlier ice break-up on Hudson Bay. A long-term study of the Southern Beaufort Sea population, which spans the northern coast of Alaska and western Canada, has revealed a decline in cub survival rates and in the weight and skull size of adult males. Such declines were observed in Western Hudson Bay bears prior to the population drop there. Another population listed as declining is Baffin Bay. According to the most recent report from the Polar Bear Specialist Group, this population, shared by Greenland and Canada, may simultaneously be suffering from significant sea ice loss and substantial over-harvesting, putting the population at great risk of a serious decline. Similarly, the Chukchi Sea population, which is shared by Russia and the United States, is likely declining due to illegal harvest in Russia and one of the highest rates of sea ice loss in the Arctic. Some Native communities in Canada have been reporting increasing numbers of polar bears on land. Traditional hunters believe this indicates an increased population, although the increased presence on land may, in fact, be related to shrinking sea ice and changes in the bears' distribution patterns. Data is needed to understand the change. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service states, "In the declining polar bear population of Canada's Western Hudson Bay, extensive scientific studies have indicated that the increased observation of bears on land is a result of changing distribution patterns and a result of changes in the accessibility of sea ice habitat." In the 1960s and 1970s, hunting was the major threat to the bears. At the time, polar bears were under such severe survival pressure from hunters that a landmark international accord was reached, despite the tensions and suspicions of the Cold War. The International Agreement on the Conservation of Polar Bears was signed in Oslo, November 15, 1973 by the five nations with polar bear populations: Canada, Denmark (Greenland, Norway, the U.S., and the former U.S.S.R. The polar bear nations agreed to prohibit random, unregulated sport hunting of polar bears and to outlaw hunting the bears from aircraft and icebreakers as had been common practice. The agreement also obliged each nation to protect polar bear denning areas and migration patterns and to conduct research relating to the conservation and management of polar bears. Finally, the nations agreed to share their polar bear research findings with each other. Member scientists of the Polar Bear Specialist Group now meet every three to four years under the auspices of the IUCN World Conservation Union to coordinate their research on polar bears throughout the Arctic. The Oslo agreement was one of the first and most successful international conservation measures enacted in the 20th century. Its legacy continues today, with member scientists from each nation continuing to work together in face new threats to the bears including climate change, pollution, industrial activities, and poaching. code
THE PROBLEM:
The polar bear population in the circumpolar north are becoming potentially endangered species. Biologist estimate that there are 20,000 to 25,000 bears with about 60% living in Canada. The biggest threat to the species is the depletion of their icy habitat due to the climate change. They depend on the ice for food, and reproducing. On May 14, 2008, the U.S. Department of the Interior reclassified the polar bears as threatened species. Most of the declines have been directly linked to the problem with the ice melting and habitat depletion. Many have also hunted the polar bears using aircrafts and icebreakers, in which was popular and common. They have also started to band the sport of hunting of the polar bears in several places that have polar bears.
THE POTENTIAL CONSEQUENCES:
-The species of polar bears will continue to decrease and eventually be eliminated.
The environment issues will increase more and more. Global warming is increasing and contributed to polar ice caps melting and the climate becoming warmer. This problem might increase in time all over the world and create problems for future generations to come.
THE SOLUTIONS:
Stop the depletion of the o-zone layer and global warming.
The should become more stricter with environmental laws. They should stop the air pollution and try to make the air cleaner. They should start taking big steps to clean up the pollution that is helping to deplete the o-zone layer.
They should make sure the laws on hunting are stricter and should closely watch hunters and offenders.
THE ECONOMY:
the profits that are made from the hunting and selling of the polar bears will be non existence. That might help to feed families.
They are using money to help monitor the hunting and to help clean up the environment.